Analytics dashboard for podcast networks showing which shows drive listener retention, sponsorship appeal, and cross-promotion opportunities across multiple feeds.
20 ranked · checked 27 August 2026Read the run →
Every media tech name we have published, in one place
This page is not a search. It gathers the 3 media tech briefs run through NameFlow — 60 names ranked out of 2,975 candidates — and shows the best of them with the brief each one came from.
Most recent run 27 August 2026 · every figure recounted on each request
What these 3 runs actually didsummed across every published run in this category
2,975generated
2,397past gate 0
2,231after dedup
1,248available
60ranked
2,915 candidates were thrown away across the 3 runs: duplicates, near-duplicates, and names with nothing free to register. Every name below survived that in its own run.
Where they went
Exact duplicates576
Famous-mark landmines2
Near-duplicates166
No acceptable domain free983
How much was already taken
.com11%
Only 11% of media tech candidates had a free .com, and .com is the only rate a run can measure honestly — it is checked first, so nothing else conditions it.
Availability across every extension is measured on one shared sample of 1,999 names, so the four are comparable there and not here.
The briefs behind this page
3 runs · newest firstAnalytics for video creators showing which clips drive rewatches, shares, and subscriber growth across YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram Reels.
20 ranked · checked 26 August 2026Read the run →
Software that helps documentary filmmakers manage rights clearances for archived footage, tracking expiry dates and licensing terms across multiple suppliers.
20 ranked · checked 25 August 2026Read the run →
Each brief is the sentence its author typed, published with the run. Nothing on this page was written about media tech by us.
9 names, still available
of 60 ranked · scores 72–81Every brief represented. The default: our selection is strong, our ordering is not.
podprism
.ai.io.co
Prism metaphor sells the core value: splitting one feed into visible facets like retention and sponsorship fit.
Watch · Prism implies light/color breakdown, which may confuse buyers into expecting a visualization tool rather than analytics.
Score81#1 of its run
playrise
.ai
Signals growth and playback in one friendly word.
Watch · Sounds like a gaming or fitness app, not a serious analytics tool.
Score74#1 of its run
clearmate
.ai.io.co
Directly names the core job of rights clearance, so buyers instantly know the category.
Watch · The 'mate' suffix feels casual and consumer-ish for what should read as compliance-grade software.
Score75#1 of its run
hearwise
.ai.io.co
Wise suffix gives it an advisor feel, good for a tool that guides sponsorship and cross-promo decisions.
Watch · Sounds more like a consumer listening app than a B2B analytics platform for networks.
Score72#2 of its run
percuss
.ai.co
Short, distinctive, and easy to say on a call.
Watch · Reads as a music or medical term, no link to video metrics.
Score72#2 of its run
permedia
.ai.io.co
Blends 'permission' and 'media' into something that sounds like an established enterprise platform.
Watch · Close enough to 'multimedia' or 'permedia' as a chemistry term that search results may get muddled.
Score72#2 of its run
podrank
.ai
Immediately communicates the ranking/comparison function across shows in a network.
Watch · Rank alone undersells the retention and sponsorship dimensions, sounding like a single leaderboard metric.
Score72#3 of its run
relyze
.io
Feels like reliable analysis, an easy sell to a data-minded buyer.
Watch · The 'y' swap for 'analyze' looks like a typo when typed fast.
Score72#3 of its run
granter
.co
Speaks to the licensing action itself, which buyers in rights management will recognize instantly.
Watch · Sounds like a generic legal-tech utility and gives up any distinctiveness once competitors use similar verb-names.
Score72#3 of its run
These are all names a run confirmed free on the date it ran, and each links back to the run that produced it. We are confident about which names are good and much less confident about which is best, so nothing here is numbered one to 9 — the ranks shown belong to the run they came from.
One sample, every extension asked for every name. A per-run rate for anything after .com is conditional on the earlier ones failing, so the comparison lives there rather than here.
Add your brief to this page
One sentence about the business. Around 500 candidates screened, availability confirmed before anything is ranked, and twenty names out with the case for and against each one.
The category is worked out from what the brief describes, so a media tech brief joins this page and anything else joins its own.
Every search is published at its own page, brief included, and anyone can read it — private searches are coming for paid accounts. Your brief never touches a third-party domain-search widget: we resolve availability on our own infrastructure and never sell your search terms.
.com.ai.io.co500 candidates