Analytics dashboard for indie game developers showing which levels players quit most, and how long they're spending in each zone.
20 ranked · checked 24 August 2026Read the run →
Every gaming name we have published, in one place
This page is not a search. It gathers the 4 gaming briefs run through NameFlow — 80 names ranked out of 2,974 candidates — and shows the best of them with the brief each one came from.
Most recent run 24 August 2026 · every figure recounted on each request
What these 4 runs actually didsummed across every published run in this category
2,974generated
2,297past gate 0
2,101after dedup
1,511available
80ranked
2,894 candidates were thrown away across the 4 runs: duplicates, near-duplicates, and names with nothing free to register. Every name below survived that in its own run.
Where they went
Exact duplicates667
Famous-mark landmines10
Near-duplicates196
No acceptable domain free590
How much was already taken
.com16%
Only 16% of gaming candidates had a free .com, and .com is the only rate a run can measure honestly — it is checked first, so nothing else conditions it.
Availability across every extension is measured on one shared sample of 1,999 names, so the four are comparable there and not here.
The briefs behind this page
4 runs · newest firstA marketplace where small studios license background music and sound effects for a single title.
20 ranked · checked 22 August 2026Read the run →
A tool that turns a game's crash reports into a ranked list of what to fix before the next patch.
20 ranked · checked 22 August 2026Read the run →
A platform where indie game studios run playtests and collect structured feedback.
20 ranked · checked 21 August 2026Read the run →
Each brief is the sentence its author typed, published with the run. Nothing on this page was written about gaming by us.
9 names, still available
of 80 ranked · scores 72–81Every brief represented. The default: our selection is strong, our ordering is not.
gamedive
.ai.io.co
Immediately signals diving deep into gameplay data, which matches the analytics-into-levels promise.
Watch · Sounds more like a game review or discovery site than an analytics tool, which could confuse buyers scanning a category.
Score72#1 of its run
wavemint
.ai.co
'mint' implies newly-minted, clean licensed audio, which fits single-title licensing nicely
Watch · mint can suggest currency or candy, pulling attention away from audio
Score81#1 of its run
tracerank
.ai.io.co
Says exactly what it does: trace input, rank output.
Watch · Sounds like an analytics dashboard, not a fix-it tool, which undersells the action-oriented value.
Score81#1 of its run
playworth
.ai.io.co
Suggests value assessment, which maps neatly to playtest feedback on whether a game is worth playing.
Watch · Reads more like a valuation or resale service than a feedback platform.
Score81#1 of its run
retently
.ai
Short and easy to say, with 'retent-' hinting at retention without spelling it out.
Watch · Close enough to 'recently' that people will mishear or misspell it on a call.
Score72#2 of its run
trackbay
.ai.io.co
'bay' suggests a storage/loading dock for tracks, apt for a marketplace metaphor
Watch · 'bay' is heavily used in marketplace names and risks feeling like a generic auction-site echo
Score81#2 of its run
fixtura
.ai
Reads as a real product name, easy to say and spell.
Watch · The 'fix' promise is diluted by the vague '-tura' suffix, so it doesn't signal triage or ranking at all.
Score73#2 of its run
betatown
.ai.io
Evokes a lively hub of beta testers, giving a communal feel that fits indie studio culture.
Watch · The 'town' metaphor skews toward a social network vibe rather than a structured data tool.
Score74#2 of its run
playonic
.ai
The '-onic' suffix gives it a scientific, instrument-like feel that suits a data dashboard.
Watch · The connection to retention or quit-points isn't obvious, so it will need extra explaining in every pitch.
Score72#3 of its run
These are all names a run confirmed free on the date it ran, and each links back to the run that produced it. We are confident about which names are good and much less confident about which is best, so nothing here is numbered one to 9 — the ranks shown belong to the run they came from.
One sample, every extension asked for every name. A per-run rate for anything after .com is conditional on the earlier ones failing, so the comparison lives there rather than here.
Add your brief to this page
One sentence about the business. Around 500 candidates screened, availability confirmed before anything is ranked, and twenty names out with the case for and against each one.
The category is worked out from what the brief describes, so a gaming brief joins this page and anything else joins its own.
Every search is published at its own page, brief included, and anyone can read it — private searches are coming for paid accounts. Your brief never touches a third-party domain-search widget: we resolve availability on our own infrastructure and never sell your search terms.
.com.ai.io.co500 candidates